Skip to main content
PeakPilot

For real-estate advisers

Make the energy impact of a client property decision-ready.

Compare your client's building load, PV, charging infrastructure and battery storage within the grid-connection limits. Link technical variants to an auditable investment decision.

Building profile, grid import, export and investment assumptions on the same interval timeline.

LianderStedinEnexisTenneTEPEX SPOTKNMI

The advisory challenge

Separate energy measures do not create a coherent business case.

Building load, generation, charging and storage affect the same connection. A shared calculation basis is needed to compare measures fairly.

  1. 01

    Annual totals miss the peak

    A favourable annual balance can still contain short periods of high grid import or export.

  2. 02

    Measures are assessed separately

    PV, charging infrastructure and batteries change one another's use and financial outcome.

  3. 03

    Sources and assumptions become scattered

    Meter data, connection values, quotes and contract prices often live in separate files and versions.

Your client's questions

Connect each technical measure to the property decision.

Show what constrains the connection, what each variant changes and which assumptions drive the result.

01

Where does peak demand occur in the building profile?

Identify which intervals and load components drive grid import or export.

02

What changes with PV, EV charging or storage?

Compare measures separately and together without changing the starting point.

03

Which business case can the client defend?

Set investment, operating costs, lifetime and energy outcomes against the same source data.

Inside the advisory model

One calculation basis for property, connection and investment.

Make every conclusion traceable to the client profile, selected variant and stated assumptions.

Building profile by interval

Import meter data and check period, unit, time zone and missing intervals.

Grid import and export

Define both connection limits separately and assess when a scenario approaches them.

Asset scenarios

Compare PV, business charging and battery variants for the same site and measurement period.

Financial modelling

Connect energy flows to CAPEX, OPEX, tariffs, lifetime and replacement assumptions.

Method

From client property to an auditable scenario comparison.

Map the site

Record meter data, connection, contract and existing or planned assets.

Build investment variants

Create scenarios for PV, EV charging, battery storage or a combination.

Support the client recommendation

Compare technical and financial outcomes and identify uncertainties needing further work.

For the client conversation

Show why a property scenario does or does not fit.

Connect site data to the consequences for the grid, energy flows and investment.

01

Profile and peak analysis

Insight into grid import, export, decisive intervals and entered connection limits.

02

Measure comparison

A consistent comparison of the baseline with PV, charging and battery scenarios.

03

Investment report

A client-facing summary of source data, assumptions, energy outcomes and financial indicators.

FAQ

Questions before choosing this workflow.

Can I compare several measures for one client property?

Yes. Create a scenario for each measure or combination using the same meter data and connection limits.

What meter data do I need?

Use a complete interval series for load and generation where possible. Add contract limits and current project assumptions.

Can PeakPilot allocate costs among different tenants?

No. PeakPilot models behind the defined connection. Allocating costs, rights or revenues between tenants requires separate legal and administrative assessment.

Can I assess grid import and export separately?

Yes. Define both limits separately and see which intervals determine import and export.

Does the battery model include losses and degradation?

The model supports efficiency, standby loss and annual degradation. Use project-specific values from current documentation.

Does the outcome guarantee property value or payback?

No. Financial outcomes follow from data and assumptions. They are not a valuation, financing recommendation or return guarantee.

Make the next real-estate recommendation traceable to interval data.

Start with the building profile and compare measures on one auditable calculation basis.

Start a free simulation