Charger power and connectors
Define nominal charger power and the number of connectors per charging site.
Inputs are validated at the project boundary before simulation.
Business EV charging
Link every charging site to a client profile and simulate it with building load, PV, battery storage and the grid connection.
Charging profile, building load and connection on the same timeline
The problem
Arrival times, occupancy, building load and local generation determine which intervals are actually critical.
The solution
Configure charger power and connectors, link the correct profile and compare charging strategies as explicit scenarios.
From chargers to site impact
Configure charger power and connectors, link the correct profile and compare charging strategies as explicit scenarios.
Define nominal charger power and the number of connectors per charging site.
Inputs are validated at the project boundary before simulation.Link measured or planned charging demand to the correct charging site in the topology.
With multiple charging sites, every channel remains linked to its own asset.See how EV charging coincides with building load, PV generation and battery dispatch.
Grid import and peak demand use the same interval timeline.Compare charging profiles and asset assumptions across energy, grid impact and costs.
Outcomes follow from configured tariffs and financial inputs.Every conclusion remains attached to the resolution, limits and inputs that determine it.
Charging demand and site load share the same interval timeline.
Charging profiles can use kW or kWh per interval.
Each EV channel belongs to one charging asset in the topology.
How it works
Import building load and add the connection, PV and existing assets.
Configure charging sites and link every charging profile to the correct asset.
Assess peak demand, energy flows and financial outcomes for each variant.
Illustrative decision case
An adviser helps a fictional service fleet electrify more vehicles at a site with PV and limited import capacity.
In the scenario
What becomes visible
The charging peak depends on arrival times and building load, not only on installed charger power.
Decision direction
Compare adjusted charging windows first, then test battery storage against the remaining peak.
This is a fictional example, not a customer result or savings claim. Outcomes depend on the entered charging profile.Read next
A practical guide connected to this decision.
Explore the knowledge baseFAQ
A measured profile provides the strongest basis. For a planned site, you can link a supported forecast profile as long as its assumptions and units are explicit.
PeakPilot compares the charging profiles you provide as scenarios. Model an adjusted charging strategy as an explicit profile, not as hidden optimization.
Yes. Each charging site has its own asset and profile channel, preserving the origin of charging demand.
Yes. The topology supports EV charging, PV, battery storage, site load and the grid connection in one scenario.
Reports use configured contracts and asset assumptions for costs, cash flows and decision indicators. The result is not a return guarantee.
Combine client charging profiles with actual site load and compare the scenarios.
Start a free simulation