What fits within the existing connection?
Test added load, generation and storage against separate import and export limits.
PeakPilot for energy advisers
Support every energy recommendation with an auditable scenario comparison.
Bring client data, grid connection, assets and financial assumptions together. Compare options on the same interval timeline and show what changes each outcome.
Every outcome remains connected to the project's measurements, connection limits, asset settings and financial assumptions.
LianderStedinEnexisTenneTEPEX SPOTKNMI
Why advisory work stalls
A credible recommendation needs more than a balanced annual total.
Grid import, export and asset behaviour meet in the same intervals. Separate files make that interaction difficult to audit.
- 01
Assumptions become scattered
Measurements, quotes, tariffs and technical parameters live in different files and versions.
- 02
Peak load stays hidden
Annual consumption does not show when a contract limit is reached or how much headroom remains.
- 03
The conclusion is hard to explain
Without traceable scenarios, it is unclear which input drives the investment recommendation.
Questions from advisory practice
Answer what a client asks before committing capital.
PeakPilot connects technical feasibility, grid impact and financial consequences in one comparable model.
Which option changes the risk profile?
Compare charging strategies, PV capacity and battery configurations using the same source data.
Which assumptions drive the business case?
Make contracts, tariffs, investment, lifetime and asset performance explicit in each scenario.
Advisory toolkit
Move from raw client data to a traceable decision.
Use one project structure for technical analysis, financial comparison and client handover.
Validate interval data
Import Excel or CSV and review timestamps, units, periods and missing intervals.
Model the site as a system
Connect the grid, load, PV, EV charging and battery storage as they interact on site.
Compare scenarios consistently
Place options side by side using the same measurement period and stated baseline.
Present traceable results
Connect energy, peak load and financial outcomes to the sources and assumptions used.
Method
Three steps from intake to recommendation.
Define the baseline
Import client data and configure the connection, contract, tariffs and existing assets.
Build the decision options
Add planned assets or profiles and define technical and financial assumptions for each option.
Compare and substantiate
Assess grid impact, energy flows and financial outcomes and state uncertainties in the advice.
What you deliver
An advisory record that clients and reviewers can follow.
The output separates what was measured, what was assumed and what changes by scenario.
Auditable baseline
A defined timeline with grid limits, contract and existing assets.
Scenario comparison
A consistent comparison of energy, peak load and financial indicators.
Decision report
A transferable summary of inputs, assumptions, outcomes and points requiring attention.
Explore further
Move from advisory question to deeper analysis.
Explore the solutions and guidance commonly used in an energy advisory project.
FAQ
Questions before choosing this workflow.
Which client data do I need?
Preferably use interval data with timestamps and load or generation, plus the grid connection limits. Add contract, tariff and investment assumptions for financial outcomes.
Can I advise before all measured data is available?
You can use an explicit profile or generated series for an exploratory scenario. Record its source and uncertainty, then replace it when measured interval data becomes available.
Can PeakPilot model several assets at one site?
Yes. The project topology supports the grid connection, load, PV, EV charging and battery storage on one timeline.
How do scenarios remain comparable?
Use the same measurement period and baseline, and change only the assumptions that belong to the option. Record those changes visibly.
Which financial outcomes can I discuss?
Reports use configured contracts and asset assumptions for costs, cash flows and decision indicators. The result remains a model estimate, not a return guarantee.
Does PeakPilot replace professional judgement?
No. PeakPilot structures the calculation and makes sources and assumptions auditable. The adviser remains responsible for interpretation and the final recommendation.
Build your next recommendation on one auditable timeline.
Start with client data and keep every option, assumption and outcome in the same project.
Start a free simulation