Skip to main content
PeakPilot

For industrial advisers

Make industrial electrification auditable before the investment decision.

Model your client's existing process load, planned electrification, PV and battery storage within the same connection limits. Show which intervals and assumptions drive the business case.

Process profile, grid limits, energy flows and financial assumptions in one traceable advisory model.

LianderStedinEnexisTenneTEPEX SPOTKNMI

The advisory challenge

A new electric process changes more than annual consumption.

Industrial investments affect production schedules, peak demand and grid capacity together. Advisers need more than a sum of installed power.

  1. 01

    Process load is estimated too coarsely

    Power and operating hours do not show when a new process overlaps existing peaks or PV generation.

  2. 02

    Grid congestion becomes a detached constraint

    Without an interval profile, it remains unclear how often and how long the entered connection limit is approached.

  3. 03

    Technology and investment diverge

    Process changes, PV and BESS are difficult to compare when project horizons, tariffs and replacements differ.

Your client's questions

Clarify which production and investment choices change the grid profile.

Use scenarios to show which combination of timing, assets and assumptions needs further investigation.

01

What does the new process do to peak demand?

Layer the planned process profile over existing interval data and assess total grid import.

02

Which schedule fits the entered grid limit?

Compare process windows or phasing without suggesting that PeakPilot controls production or equipment.

03

When do PV or battery storage contribute?

Assess when generation or battery dispatch changes the energy balance and business case.

Inside the advisory model

Connect process data, grid impact and financial outcomes.

Keep the calculation basis visible and scenarios comparable for the client, technical team and finance.

Existing and planned process profiles

Combine measured interval data with an explicit profile for new or modified electrical processes.

Connection limits by direction

Assess grid import and export separately within the limits defined for the project.

Asset scenarios

Compare process phasing, PV and battery variants using the same baseline and measurement period.

Multi-year financial assumptions

Include investment, operating costs, tariffs, lifetime, degradation and replacement assumptions.

Method

From process question to a supported client scenario.

Record the reference case

Import interval data and define the connection, contract, existing assets and financial assumptions.

Model the process variants

Add planned process load, PV or battery storage and state timing and technical assumptions.

Compare and document

Report grid impact, energy flows, financial outcomes and uncertainties for each scenario.

For the client conversation

Give technical and finance teams the same decision basis.

Show which input and scenario sit behind every conclusion.

01

Process and grid profile

A view of combined interval load, decisive peaks and entered connection limits.

02

Variant comparison

A consistent comparison of process timing, phasing, PV and battery storage.

03

Decision report

A client-facing summary of source data, technical effects, financial indicators and open assumptions.

FAQ

Questions before choosing this workflow.

How do I model a planned electrical process?

Add a supported interval profile with power, timing and operating pattern. Compare it with the existing meter series and record its source.

Can I compare different production windows?

Yes. Create one scenario per process window using the same site and contract data. PeakPilot compares outcomes but does not control production.

Can I add PV and battery storage to the same scenario?

Yes. Both asset types can be modelled with process load and the grid connection in one site topology.

Does PeakPilot solve grid congestion for my client?

No. PeakPilot does not reserve transport capacity or replace the grid operator. It makes scenarios within entered limits auditable.

Can I compare quotes for different assets?

Enter relevant characteristics as separate variants and verify them against current supplier documentation and quote terms.

Are financial outcomes a return guarantee?

No. Outcomes follow from project data, tariffs and assumptions and do not guarantee returns, production or grid capacity.

Build the next industrial client recommendation on a visible calculation basis.

Start with existing interval data and compare process, grid and battery scenarios.

Start a free simulation