Is the endpoint a decision or control strategy?
An investment record needs a different workflow from live asset control.

Compare PeakPilot with Tibo Energy
PeakPilot focuses on auditable simulations and client decisions. Tibo publicly positions its Simulator as the digital basis for simulation and a potential next step into Tibo EMS.
Choose based on project objective, required independence and the handover after advice.
Two different endpoints
Both can be valuable. The right route depends on who owns implementation, control and further optimisation after the advice.
The client needs variants, assumptions and financial consequences.
The project may continue into integrations, gateway and operational control.
Define how much freedom is required in later EMS and asset selection.
Selection questions
Before selecting software, agree where your assignment ends and who owns technical execution and operations.
An investment record needs a different workflow from live asset control.
Decide whether multiple providers still need to be compared after simulation.
Define the data, scenarios and financial inputs that must transfer.
At a glance
This table compares public positioning and product emphasis. Ask both suppliers for current technical details for your project.
| Criterion | PeakPilot | Tibo Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Primary positioning | Auditable simulation and client decision | Simulator plus broader route into Tibo EMS |
| Endpoint | Advice, scenario comparison and reporting | Simulation, validation and possible implementation/control |
| Model building | Site topology with explicit project assumptions | Publicly described Digital Twin of assets and constraints |
| Scenarios | Named engineering and financial variants | Publicly described unlimited scenarios in the Simulator |
| Operational control | Not part of PeakPilot | Available through Tibo EMS and Gateway |
| Entry | Start a free simulation | Partner or demo request |
PeakPilot's focus
PeakPilot makes the client decision auditable without claiming to control assets in real time.
Interval data, connection limits and contract assumptions form the explicit basis.
Load, PV, EV charging and BESS are assessed in one site topology.
Peak demand, energy flows and business case stay linked to the same scenario.
The client sees both the recommendation and the evidence supporting it.
Practical trial
State whether you only support the investment or continue into EMS implementation.
Use equal measurements, grid limits, assets and financial assumptions.
Check what client, installer and EMS provider receive after your advice.
Decide on project fit
A sound software choice makes responsibilities explicit and prevents the implementation route from steering the analysis unnoticed.
A defined endpoint for analysis, client decision and possible implementation.
A deliberate trade-off between open EMS selection and one integrated route.
Sources, scenarios and decisions usable by the next project partner.
Explore the choice
These pages help clarify the advisory question and technical scenario first.
FAQ
No. PeakPilot simulates and supports investment decisions, but does not control assets in real time or replace an EMS.
No. According to its public product information, Tibo also provides an Energy Simulator for modelling systems, comparing scenarios and preparing business cases.
That depends on contracts and implementation. PeakPilot stands apart from operational EMS control. Tibo offers an integrated next step into its EMS. Discuss the freedom your client requires.
Public Tibo Energy product pages and available PeakPilot functionality. Always verify technical and commercial terms directly with both suppliers.
Yes. Start with a scoped case, import interval data and compare at least two scenarios on equal assumptions.
Build one client case and assess the evidence trail from data to decision.
Start a free simulation