Do sources and assumptions remain visible?
A question months later should lead back to period, unit, limit and scenario.

Compare PeakPilot with Wattix
Both platforms help energy professionals model scenarios. The main difference is how you want to move from client data to variants, evidence and handover.
Compare the same client case using the same source data, assumptions and desired outcome.
No single winner
An installer sizing systems quickly has different needs from an adviser who must defend assumptions, scenarios and decisions.
Check how each platform validates source data and separates scenarios.
Assess not only the outcome, but also what the client can verify later.
Use a representative case and define success before starting the trial.
Selection questions
Use one existing client case and assess both platforms on repeatability, explainability and decision quality.
A question months later should lead back to period, unit, limit and scenario.
A sound comparison keeps measurement period, contract and financial basis equal.
Check whether engineering, finance and direction can be handed over together.
At a glance
This table describes publicly visible product emphasis. Always verify current functionality in your own trial project.
| Criterion | PeakPilot | Wattix |
|---|---|---|
| Primary positioning | Auditable energy simulations and client decisions | Broad simulation platform for energy professionals |
| Scenario approach | Explicit variants with visible assumptions | Multiple configurations and scenario comparison |
| Battery selection | Compare deliberately configured kW and kWh variants | Publicly described automatic battery sizing |
| Method | Traceable inputs, topology and decision context | Publicly described mathematical optimisation models |
| Reporting | Results, assumptions and shareable reports | PDF reporting and public white-label proposition |
| Entry | Start a free simulation | Request a demo |
PeakPilot's focus
PeakPilot is built for advisers who want to show how a conclusion was reached, not only produce a calculation.
Period, unit and missing intervals stay visible before simulation.
Grid, load, PV, EV charging and battery storage remain recognizable connected parts.
Every variant retains its own engineering and financial assumptions.
Results remain attached to source, scenario, unit and decision point.
Practical trial
Use interval data, a clear client question and at least two variants.
Assess input, model building, turnaround, comparison and reporting.
The best workflow is the one a second adviser can follow without a verbal briefing.
Decide with evidence
Not only a preference, but a supported choice for how your team delivers projects.
The same data, scenarios and expected outcomes for both platforms.
Criteria weighted for advisers, reviewers and client presentations.
Including what remains, what must be rebuilt and what needs validation.
Explore the choice
Use these pages to connect the criteria to your own advisory practice.
FAQ
Not in every situation. PeakPilot emphasizes an auditable client record and explicit scenario assumptions. Wattix publicly positions itself as a broad simulation platform with automatic sizing among its capabilities. Test both on your workflow.
PeakPilot compares battery variants you configure deliberately. The preferred variant depends on the objective, engineering limits, client data and financial assumptions.
Public Wattix product pages and functionality available in PeakPilot. The information was checked on the stated date and may change.
Yes. That is the best way to judge whether input, scenario comparison and reporting fit your team.
You can start a free simulation in PeakPilot. Use a scoped case and define the outcomes you want to assess first.
Start with interval data and judge how far the evidence trail reaches.
Start a free simulation