How much charging demand fits the connection?
Assess grid import by interval with existing building load and planned charging on the same timeline.
For logistics advisers
Support the electrification of logistics client sites.
Bring your client's building load, vehicle schedules, charging infrastructure, PV and battery storage onto one interval timeline. Show which scenarios fit the connection and which assumptions still need work.
Interval data, charging windows, grid limits and financial assumptions in one auditable client record.
LianderStedinEnexisTenneTEPEX SPOTKNMI
The advisory challenge
Fleet plans and energy plans rarely tell the same story at first.
Logistics clients often plan vehicles, chargers and building systems separately. A defensible recommendation needs their effects assessed on the same timeline.
- 01
Charging demand is detached from building load
Vehicle counts and charger ratings say little without arrival times, dwell windows and the site's existing interval profile.
- 02
Peak demand stays hidden
Annual totals do not reveal when grid import approaches the contract limit or which charging windows create the decisive peak.
- 03
Quotes use different assumptions
Charging, PV and BESS proposals are hard to compare when suppliers use different profiles, prices or project horizons.
Your client's questions
Make the decision questions explicit before comparing solutions.
Separate technical and financial questions without losing the relationship between them.
Which moments determine peak demand?
Show when vehicles, building load and PV generation compound one another or leave connection headroom.
Which variant deserves further work?
Compare charging windows, phasing and battery variants using the same source data and stated financial assumptions.
Inside the advisory model
From vehicle schedule to a traceable business case.
Keep inputs, scenarios and outcomes together so clients and financiers can follow the reasoning.
Interval data and charging profiles
Combine meter series with vehicle counts, energy demand, charger power and available charging windows.
Site topology
Connect the grid connection, building load, PV, EV charging and battery storage as they meet at the client site.
Comparable scenarios
Set a baseline against phased electrification, different charging windows or a BESS variant.
Technical and financial outcomes
Review peak demand, energy flows, investment, operating costs and lifetime assumptions together.
Method
From client data to advice in three steps.
Record the starting point
Import interval data and define the connection, building load, fleet and contract assumptions.
Build the variants
Add charging scenarios, PV or battery storage while keeping the same calculation basis.
Compare and report
Assess grid impact and financial outcomes, then record the evidence supporting the recommendation.
For the client conversation
Deliver advice that goes beyond one peak value.
Keep the link between source data, scenario and conclusion visible.
Grid impact by scenario
A view of grid import, export, decisive intervals and any exceedance of entered limits.
Scenario comparison
A consistent comparison of charging windows, phasing, PV and battery variants.
Decision report
A client-facing report covering assumptions, technical results, financial indicators and open issues.
Go deeper
Explore the decisions behind the logistics business case.
Use the solutions and knowledge base to support your client engagement.
FAQ
Questions before choosing this workflow.
What data do I need for a logistics client?
Use site interval data, grid-connection limits and a charging profile with vehicle counts, energy demand and charging windows. Add project and contract assumptions for financial outcomes.
Can I compare different fleet phases?
Yes. Build each phase as a separate scenario using the same source data, keeping peak demand, energy and finance comparable.
Can battery storage be modelled with EV charging?
Yes. EV charging, PV, building load and battery storage can share one site topology and be compared as variants.
Does PeakPilot predict when extra transport capacity becomes available?
No. Availability and queues remain with the grid operator. PeakPilot models the limits and assumptions you define.
Am I tied to a charger or battery brand?
No. Enter the relevant characteristics and verify them against current supplier documentation and quotations.
Can I use the outcomes in a client meeting?
Yes. Reports keep sources, scenarios and assumptions visible. Outcomes remain project-specific and do not guarantee capacity or returns.
Base the next logistics client project on interval data.
Start with the existing meter series and compare charging, grid and battery scenarios.
Start a free simulation